Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (NVIDIA) and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 3 September 2026

As of 3 September 2026, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#190 vs #192); Nemotron 3 Nano Omni is cheaper per output token (Free/1M vs $1.00/1M); Nemotron 3 Nano Omni offers the longer context window (256K vs 33K tokens); and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Nemotron 3 Nano Omni if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #190 against #192 (14.3 vs 11.0 points).
  • API cost matters — Free/1M output tokens against $1.00/1M.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost Free/1M against $0.66/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 256K tokens against 33K.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Nemotron 3 Nano Omni was listed 28 April 2026, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 11 November 2024.

Choose Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct if…

  • you want to self-host: Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct ships open weights while Nemotron 3 Nano Omni is restricted license.

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Nemotron 3 Nano Omni and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
FieldNemotron 3 Nano OmniNVIDIAQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen
ModelCap Index position#190#192
Index score14.311.0
EvidenceEstimatedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokensFree$0.66
Output price / 1M tokensFree$1.00
Context window256K tokens33K tokens
Max output tokens66K29K
API providers listed11
Weight accessRestricted licenseOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, Audio, Image, VideoText
First listed28 April 202611 November 2024
PublisherNVIDIAQwen

Evidence: publisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Public benchmark boards where Nemotron 3 Nano Omni or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has a published result
BoardNemotron 3 Nano OmniQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)—13421324–1361Only one result
SWE-benchSWE-bench (Princeton / SWE-agent team)—9.0%Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis—6.9intelligence-indexOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis—3.5%humanitys-last-examOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: common questions

Is Nemotron 3 Nano Omni better than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 3 September 2026: #190 against #192. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it.

Is Nemotron 3 Nano Omni cheaper than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni is cheaper on output tokens: Free/1M against $1.00/1M. Input tokens are Free/1M for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni and $0.66/1M for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens.

Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni has the larger context window: 256K tokens against 33K.

Which is better for coding, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Nemotron 3 Nano Omni and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct open-weight models?

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni: Restricted license. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Nemotron 3 Nano Omni and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni and 1 for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Nemotron 3 Nano Omni vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 3 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further