Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash

Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B (NVIDIA) and Step 3.7 Flash (StepFun) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 9 September 2026

As of 9 September 2026, Step 3.7 Flash holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#81 vs #83); and Step 3.7 Flash ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B if…

  • ModelCap publishes no field on which Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B leads Step 3.7 Flash for this pair.

Choose Step 3.7 Flash if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #81 against #83 (48.2 vs 46.8 points).
  • you want to self-host: Step 3.7 Flash ships open weights while Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B is restricted license.
  • you want provider choice — 3 listed API providers against 0.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Step 3.7 Flash was listed 28 May 2026, Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B 30 March 2026.

Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B and Step 3.7 Flash
FieldIsing Calibration 1 35B A3BNVIDIAStep 3.7 FlashStepFun
ModelCap Index position#83#81
Index score46.848.2
EvidenceInheritedEstimated
Input price / 1M tokensUnlisted$0.20
Output price / 1M tokensUnlisted$1.15
Context window— tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens230K
API providers listed03
Weight accessRestricted licenseOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video
First listed30 March 202628 May 2026
PublisherNVIDIAStepFun

Evidence: finetune of qwen/qwen3.5-35b-a3b · finetune (100%) · 3 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (14%); global-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (19%); measured predecessor stepfun/step-3.5-flash less the succession penalty (67%); shrunk 1.3 up toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash

Public benchmark boards where Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B or Step 3.7 Flash has a published result
BoardIsing Calibration 1 35B A3BStep 3.7 FlashLeads
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis39.3%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Step 3.7 Flash":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis98.5%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Step 3.7 Flash":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis21.4%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Step 3.7 Flash":reasoning=trueOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash: common questions

Is Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #81 against #83. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B cheaper than Step 3.7 Flash?

At least one of the two has no listed API price on ModelCap right now, so no price comparison is made.

Which has the bigger context window, Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B or Step 3.7 Flash?

Both publish a —-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B or Step 3.7 Flash?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B and Step 3.7 Flash open-weight models?

Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B: Restricted license. Step 3.7 Flash: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B and Step 3.7 Flash?

ModelCap currently lists 0 API providers for Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B and 3 for Step 3.7 Flash, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further