Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Kimi K2.7 Code vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

Kimi K2.7 Code (Moonshot AI) and Kimi K3.1 Pro (Moonshot AI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 24 October 2026

As of 24 October 2026, Kimi K3.1 Pro holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#21 vs #54); Kimi K2.7 Code is 3× cheaper per output token ($3.35/1M vs $10.00/1M); and Kimi K3.1 Pro offers the longer context window (1M vs 262K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Kimi K2.7 Code if…

  • API cost matters — $3.35/1M output tokens against $10.00/1M, about 3× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.671/1M against $2.00/1M.
  • you want provider choice — 11 listed API providers against 1.

Choose Kimi K3.1 Pro if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #21 against #54 (78.6 vs 64.6 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 262K.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 55.1 against 25.8.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 52.5% against 35.0%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Kimi K3.1 Pro was listed 23 October 2026, Kimi K2.7 Code 12 June 2026.

Kimi K2.7 Code vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Kimi K2.7 Code and Kimi K3.1 Pro
FieldKimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AIKimi K3.1 ProMoonshot AI
ModelCap Index position#54#21
Index score64.678.6
EvidenceEstimatedEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$0.671$2.00
Output price / 1M tokens$3.35$10.00
Context window262K tokens1M tokens
Declared route output cap236K944K
API providers listed111
Weight accessRestricted licenseNo linked weights
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video
First listed12 June 202623 October 2026
PublisherMoonshot AIMoonshot AI

Evidence: 2 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (58%); publisher-corpus-prior over 211 held-out anchors (42%); shrunk 5.6 up toward the measured corpus · 1 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (61%); publisher-corpus-prior over 211 held-out anchors (39%); shrunk 4 toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

Public benchmark boards where Kimi K2.7 Code or Kimi K3.1 Pro has a published result
BoardKimi K2.7 CodeKimi K3.1 ProLeads
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis25.8Reasoning55.1ReasoningKimi K3.1 Pro
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis67.4%Reasoning—Only one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis90.1%Reasoning—Only one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis35.0%Reasoning52.5%ReasoningKimi K3.1 Pro
WildClawBench OpenClawWildClawBench46.9—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Kimi K2.7 Code vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: common questions

Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Kimi K3.1 Pro ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 24 October 2026: #21 against #54. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Kimi K2.7 Code cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper on output tokens: $3.35/1M against $10.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.671/1M for Kimi K2.7 Code and $2.00/1M for Kimi K3.1 Pro. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $3.02 for Kimi K2.7 Code versus $9.00 for Kimi K3.1 Pro. Kimi K2.7 Code costs 66.5% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K2.7 Code or Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Kimi K3.1 Pro has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 262K. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Kimi K2.7 Code or Kimi K3.1 Pro?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Kimi K2.7 Code and Kimi K3.1 Pro open-weight models?

Kimi K2.7 Code: Restricted license. Kimi K3.1 Pro: No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Kimi K2.7 Code and Kimi K3.1 Pro?

ModelCap currently lists 11 API providers for Kimi K2.7 Code and 1 for Kimi K3.1 Pro, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Kimi K2.7 Code vs Kimi K3.1 Pro comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 24 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further