Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Kimi K2.7 Code vs Kimi K2 Thinking

Kimi K2.7 Code (Moonshot AI) and Kimi K2 Thinking (Moonshot AI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 22 September 2026

As of 22 September 2026, Kimi K2 Thinking holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#47 vs #48); and Kimi K2 Thinking is 1.3× cheaper per output token ($2.50/1M vs $3.30/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose Kimi K2.7 Code if…

  • you want provider choice — 14 listed API providers against 2.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 35.0% against 23.8%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Kimi K2.7 Code was listed 12 June 2026, Kimi K2 Thinking 6 November 2025.

Choose Kimi K2 Thinking if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #47 against #48 (67.7 vs 67.1 points).
  • API cost matters — $2.50/1M output tokens against $3.30/1M, about 1.3× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.60/1M against $0.706/1M.
  • AA τ²-Bench Telecom is your yardstick — 93.0% against 90.1%.

Kimi K2.7 Code vs Kimi K2 Thinking: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Kimi K2.7 Code and Kimi K2 Thinking
FieldKimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AIKimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI
ModelCap Index position#48#47
Index score67.167.7
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.706$0.60
Output price / 1M tokens$3.30$2.50
Context window262K tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens236K98K
API providers listed142
Weight accessRestricted licenseRestricted license
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
First listed12 June 20266 November 2025
PublisherMoonshot AIMoonshot AI

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Kimi K2 Thinking

Public benchmark boards where Kimi K2.7 Code or Kimi K2 Thinking has a published result
BoardKimi K2.7 CodeKimi K2 ThinkingLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14871481–1492TurboOnly one result
SWE-benchSWE-bench (Princeton / SWE-agent team)63.4%ThinkingOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis25.8intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis90.1%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Kimi K2.7 Code":reasoning=true93.0%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Kimi K2 Thinking":reasoning=trueKimi K2 Thinking
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis35.0%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Kimi K2.7 Code":reasoning=true23.8%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Kimi K2 Thinking":reasoning=trueKimi K2.7 Code
WildClawBench OpenClawWildClawBench46.9Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Kimi K2.7 Code vs Kimi K2 Thinking: common questions

Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Kimi K2 Thinking?

Kimi K2 Thinking ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 22 September 2026: #47 against #48. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Kimi K2.7 Code cheaper than Kimi K2 Thinking?

Kimi K2 Thinking is cheaper on output tokens: $2.50/1M against $3.30/1M. Input tokens are $0.706/1M for Kimi K2.7 Code and $0.60/1M for Kimi K2 Thinking. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $3.06 for Kimi K2.7 Code versus $2.45 for Kimi K2 Thinking. Kimi K2 Thinking costs 20.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K2.7 Code or Kimi K2 Thinking?

Both publish a 262K-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Kimi K2.7 Code or Kimi K2 Thinking?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Kimi K2.7 Code and Kimi K2 Thinking open-weight models?

Kimi K2.7 Code: Restricted license. Kimi K2 Thinking: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Kimi K2.7 Code and Kimi K2 Thinking?

ModelCap currently lists 14 API providers for Kimi K2.7 Code and 2 for Kimi K2 Thinking, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Kimi K2.7 Code vs Kimi K2 Thinking comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 22 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further