Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

NextCoder 32B vs Phi 4

NextCoder 32B (Microsoft) and Phi 4 (Microsoft) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 14 September 2026

As of 14 September 2026, NextCoder 32B holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#177 vs #178).

Which should you choose?

Choose NextCoder 32B if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #177 against #178 (15.0 vs 12.8 points).
  • you want the more recently listed model — NextCoder 32B was listed 3 May 2025, Phi 4 10 January 2025.

Choose Phi 4 if…

  • you want provider choice — 1 listed API providers against 0.

NextCoder 32B vs Phi 4: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of NextCoder 32B and Phi 4
FieldNextCoder 32BMicrosoftPhi 4Microsoft
ModelCap Index position#177#178
Index score15.012.8
EvidenceInheritedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokensUnlisted$0.07
Output price / 1M tokensUnlisted$0.14
Context window— tokens16K tokens
Max output tokens15K
API providers listed01
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText
First listed3 May 202510 January 2025
PublisherMicrosoftMicrosoft

Evidence: finetune of qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct · finetune (100%) · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: NextCoder 32B vs Phi 4

Public benchmark boards where NextCoder 32B or Phi 4 has a published result
BoardNextCoder 32BPhi 4Leads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)13061296–1316Only one result
BFCL V4UC Berkeley (Gorilla)28.8PromptOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis0.0%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Phi-4":reasoning=falseOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis3.8%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Phi-4":reasoning=falseOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

NextCoder 32B vs Phi 4: common questions

Is NextCoder 32B better than Phi 4?

NextCoder 32B ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 14 September 2026: #177 against #178. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is NextCoder 32B cheaper than Phi 4?

At least one of the two has no listed API price on ModelCap right now, so no price comparison is made.

Which has the bigger context window, NextCoder 32B or Phi 4?

Both publish a —-token context window.

Which is better for coding, NextCoder 32B or Phi 4?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are NextCoder 32B and Phi 4 open-weight models?

NextCoder 32B: Open weights. Phi 4: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run NextCoder 32B and Phi 4?

ModelCap currently lists 0 API providers for NextCoder 32B and 1 for Phi 4, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this NextCoder 32B vs Phi 4 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 14 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further