Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

MediPhi PubMed vs Phi 4

MediPhi PubMed (Microsoft) and Phi 4 (Microsoft) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 22 September 2026

As of 22 September 2026, MediPhi PubMed holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#193 vs #216).

Which should you choose?

Choose MediPhi PubMed if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #193 against #216 (23.0 vs 15.3 points).
  • you want the more recently listed model — MediPhi PubMed was listed 28 May 2025, Phi 4 10 January 2025.

Choose Phi 4 if…

  • you want provider choice — 1 listed API providers against 0.

MediPhi PubMed vs Phi 4: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of MediPhi PubMed and Phi 4
FieldMediPhi PubMedMicrosoftPhi 4Microsoft
ModelCap Index position#193#216
Index score23.015.3
EvidenceInheritedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokensUnlisted$0.07
Output price / 1M tokensUnlisted$0.14
Context window— tokens16K tokens
Max output tokens15K
API providers listed01
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText
First listed28 May 202510 January 2025
PublisherMicrosoftMicrosoft

Evidence: finetune of microsoft/Phi-3.5-mini-instruct · finetune (100%) · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: MediPhi PubMed vs Phi 4

Public benchmark boards where MediPhi PubMed or Phi 4 has a published result
BoardMediPhi PubMedPhi 4Leads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)13061296–1316Only one result
BFCL V4UC Berkeley (Gorilla)28.8PromptOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis0.0%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Phi-4":reasoning=falseOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis3.8%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Phi-4":reasoning=falseOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

MediPhi PubMed vs Phi 4: common questions

Is MediPhi PubMed better than Phi 4?

MediPhi PubMed ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 22 September 2026: #193 against #216. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is MediPhi PubMed cheaper than Phi 4?

At least one of the two has no listed API price on ModelCap right now, so no price comparison is made.

Which has the bigger context window, MediPhi PubMed or Phi 4?

Both publish a —-token context window.

Which is better for coding, MediPhi PubMed or Phi 4?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are MediPhi PubMed and Phi 4 open-weight models?

MediPhi PubMed: Open weights. Phi 4: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run MediPhi PubMed and Phi 4?

ModelCap currently lists 0 API providers for MediPhi PubMed and 1 for Phi 4, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this MediPhi PubMed vs Phi 4 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 22 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further