Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Fara1.5 9B vs Phi 4

Fara1.5 9B (Microsoft) and Phi 4 (Microsoft) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 9 September 2026

As of 9 September 2026, Fara1.5 9B holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#102 vs #153).

Which should you choose?

Choose Fara1.5 9B if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #102 against #153 (39.9 vs 12.5 points).
  • you want the more recently listed model — Fara1.5 9B was listed 12 May 2026, Phi 4 10 January 2025.

Choose Phi 4 if…

  • you want provider choice — 1 listed API providers against 0.

Fara1.5 9B vs Phi 4: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Fara1.5 9B and Phi 4
FieldFara1.5 9BMicrosoftPhi 4Microsoft
ModelCap Index position#102#153
Index score39.912.5
EvidenceInheritedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokensUnlisted$0.07
Output price / 1M tokensUnlisted$0.14
Context window— tokens16K tokens
Max output tokens15K
API providers listed01
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
First listed12 May 202610 January 2025
PublisherMicrosoftMicrosoft

Evidence: finetune of qwen/qwen3.5-9b · finetune (100%) · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Fara1.5 9B vs Phi 4

Public benchmark boards where Fara1.5 9B or Phi 4 has a published result
BoardFara1.5 9BPhi 4Leads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)13061296–1316Only one result
BFCL V4UC Berkeley (Gorilla)28.8PromptOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis0.0%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Phi-4":reasoning=falseOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis3.8%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Phi-4":reasoning=falseOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Fara1.5 9B vs Phi 4: common questions

Is Fara1.5 9B better than Phi 4?

Fara1.5 9B ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #102 against #153. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.

Is Fara1.5 9B cheaper than Phi 4?

At least one of the two has no listed API price on ModelCap right now, so no price comparison is made.

Which has the bigger context window, Fara1.5 9B or Phi 4?

Both publish a —-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Fara1.5 9B or Phi 4?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Fara1.5 9B and Phi 4 open-weight models?

Fara1.5 9B: Open weights. Phi 4: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Fara1.5 9B and Phi 4?

ModelCap currently lists 0 API providers for Fara1.5 9B and 1 for Phi 4, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Fara1.5 9B vs Phi 4 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further