Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Hy4 preview

Muse Glimmer 30B (Meta) and Hy4 preview (Tencent) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 9 September 2026

As of 9 September 2026, Hy4 preview holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#26 vs #28); Muse Glimmer 30B is 2.3× cheaper per output token ($1.10/1M vs $2.50/1M); and Hy4 preview offers the longer context window (1M vs 131K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Muse Glimmer 30B if…

  • API cost matters — $1.10/1M output tokens against $2.50/1M, about 2.3× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.30/1M against $0.834/1M.
  • you want provider choice — 4 listed API providers against 1.

Choose Hy4 preview if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #26 against #28 (70.4 vs 68.4 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 131K.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Hy4 preview was listed 28 August 2026, Muse Glimmer 30B 9 August 2026.

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Hy4 preview: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Muse Glimmer 30B and Hy4 preview
FieldMuse Glimmer 30BMetaHy4 previewTencent
ModelCap Index position#28#26
Index score68.470.4
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.30$0.834
Output price / 1M tokens$1.10$2.50
Context window131K tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens118K64K
API providers listed41
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
First listed9 August 202628 August 2026
PublisherMetaTencent

Evidence: publisher-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (37%); 1 specialist-board observation at 1.3% support (21%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 12 rows (42%); exceeds every named peer on 6 of 12 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 8.1 up toward the measured corpus · 9 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (38%); publisher-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (12%); opens above measured predecessor tencent/hy3 on same-family ordering evidence (41%); 1 specialist-board observation at 2.5% support (9%); shrunk 1.2 toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Muse Glimmer 30B vs Hy4 preview

Public benchmark boards where Muse Glimmer 30B or Hy4 preview has a published result
BoardMuse Glimmer 30BHy4 previewLeads
LMArena AgentLMArena5.4%4.0%–6.8%Only one result
WildClawBench OpenClawWildClawBench47.6Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Hy4 preview: common questions

Is Muse Glimmer 30B better than Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #26 against #28. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Muse Glimmer 30B cheaper than Hy4 preview?

Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper on output tokens: $1.10/1M against $2.50/1M. Input tokens are $0.30/1M for Muse Glimmer 30B and $0.834/1M for Hy4 preview. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.15 for Muse Glimmer 30B versus $2.92 for Hy4 preview. Muse Glimmer 30B costs 60.6% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Glimmer 30B or Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 131K.

Which is better for coding, Muse Glimmer 30B or Hy4 preview?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Muse Glimmer 30B and Hy4 preview open-weight models?

Muse Glimmer 30B: Open weights. Hy4 preview: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Muse Glimmer 30B and Hy4 preview?

ModelCap currently lists 4 API providers for Muse Glimmer 30B and 1 for Hy4 preview, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Muse Glimmer 30B vs Hy4 preview comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further