Head-to-head comparison
Muse Glimmer 30B (Meta) and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.
Snapshot as of 10 September 2026
As of 10 September 2026, Muse Glimmer 30B holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#29 vs #32); Muse Glimmer 30B is 5.5× cheaper per output token ($1.10/1M vs $6.00/1M); Qwen3.8 Max (0902) offers the longer context window (1M vs 131K tokens); and Muse Glimmer 30B ships open weights.
Evidence: publisher-corpus-prior over 184 held-out anchors (36%); 1 specialist-board observation at 1.3% support (21%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 12 rows (43%); exceeds every named peer on 6 of 12 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 7.9 up toward the measured corpus · publisher-corpus-prior over 184 held-out anchors (22%); opens from measured predecessor qwen/qwen3.7-max (79%); shrunk 4.6 toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.
Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.
Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.
Muse Glimmer 30B ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 10 September 2026: #29 against #32. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper on output tokens: $1.10/1M against $6.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.30/1M for Muse Glimmer 30B and $2.00/1M for Qwen3.8 Max (0902). Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.15 for Muse Glimmer 30B versus $7.00 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902). Muse Glimmer 30B costs 83.6% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 131K.
The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.
Muse Glimmer 30B: Open weights. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.
ModelCap currently lists 4 API providers for Muse Glimmer 30B and 1 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902), from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.
Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 10 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.