Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

LongCat Flash Thinking 2601 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

LongCat Flash Thinking 2601 (Meituan Longcat) and Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 9 September 2026

As of 9 September 2026, Qwen3.5 397B A17B holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#41 vs #46).

Which should you choose?

Choose LongCat Flash Thinking 2601 if…

  • ModelCap publishes no field on which LongCat Flash Thinking 2601 leads Qwen3.5 397B A17B for this pair.

Choose Qwen3.5 397B A17B if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #41 against #46 (63.3 vs 61.1 points).
  • you want provider choice — 10 listed API providers against 0.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Qwen3.5 397B A17B was listed 16 February 2026, LongCat Flash Thinking 2601 14 January 2026.

LongCat Flash Thinking 2601 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of LongCat Flash Thinking 2601 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
FieldLongCat Flash Thinking 2601Meituan LongcatQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen
ModelCap Index position#46#41
Index score61.163.3
EvidenceEstimatedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokensUnlisted$0.55
Output price / 1M tokensUnlisted$3.50
Context window— tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens236K
API providers listed010
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
First listed14 January 202616 February 2026
PublisherMeituan LongcatQwen

Evidence: global-corpus-prior over 183 held-out anchors (11%); launch card against 4 resolved peers on 3 rows (89%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 3 rows; optimism haircut 0.15 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 0.9 toward the measured corpus · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: LongCat Flash Thinking 2601 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Public benchmark boards where LongCat Flash Thinking 2601 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a published result
BoardLongCat Flash Thinking 2601Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14911486–1496Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis19.1intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedOnly one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis51.3%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Qwen3.5 397B A17B":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis95.6%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Qwen3.5 397B A17B":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis29.0%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Qwen3.5 397B A17B":reasoning=trueOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

LongCat Flash Thinking 2601 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: common questions

Is LongCat Flash Thinking 2601 better than Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Qwen3.5 397B A17B ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #41 against #46. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is LongCat Flash Thinking 2601 cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

At least one of the two has no listed API price on ModelCap right now, so no price comparison is made.

Which has the bigger context window, LongCat Flash Thinking 2601 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Both publish a —-token context window.

Which is better for coding, LongCat Flash Thinking 2601 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are LongCat Flash Thinking 2601 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B open-weight models?

LongCat Flash Thinking 2601: Open weights. Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run LongCat Flash Thinking 2601 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

ModelCap currently lists 0 API providers for LongCat Flash Thinking 2601 and 10 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this LongCat Flash Thinking 2601 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further