Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (Kuaishou) and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 3 September 2026

As of 3 September 2026, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#59 vs #61); KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 is 1.4× cheaper per output token ($2.96/1M vs $4.00/1M); KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 offers the longer context window (262K vs 131K tokens); and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 if…

  • API cost matters — $2.96/1M output tokens against $4.00/1M, about 1.4× cheaper.
  • you need the longer context window — 262K tokens against 131K.
  • you want the more recently listed model — KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 was listed 10 July 2026, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking 23 September 2025.

Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #59 against #61 (45.6 vs 43.3 points).
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.40/1M against $0.74/1M.
  • you want to self-host: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ships open weights while KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 is api only.
  • you want provider choice — 2 listed API providers against 1.

KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
FieldKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5KuaishouQwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingQwen
ModelCap Index position#61#59
Index score43.345.6
EvidenceEstimatedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.74$0.40
Output price / 1M tokens$2.96$4.00
Context window262K tokens131K tokens
Max output tokens236K33K
API providers listed12
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
First listed10 July 202623 September 2025
PublisherKuaishouQwen

Evidence: start rank inherited from the measured predecessor in its own product family, less a fixed succession penalty, until independent measurements replace it · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Public benchmark boards where KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking has a published result
BoardKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5Qwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14541439–1468Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: common questions

Is KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 better than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 3 September 2026: #59 against #61. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it.

Is KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 is cheaper on output tokens: $2.96/1M against $4.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.74/1M for KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 and $0.40/1M for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens.

Which has the bigger context window, KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 has the larger context window: 262K tokens against 131K.

Which is better for coding, KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking open-weight models?

KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5: API only. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 and 2 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 3 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further