Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Ling-3.0-flash vs UI Mate 27B

Ling-3.0-flash (InclusionAI) and UI Mate 27B (Tencent) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 3 September 2026

As of 3 September 2026, Ling-3.0-flash holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#49 vs #52).

Which should you choose?

Choose Ling-3.0-flash if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #49 against #52 (51.7 vs 48.8 points).
  • you want provider choice — 2 listed API providers against 0.

Choose UI Mate 27B if…

  • you want the more recently listed model — UI Mate 27B was listed 14 August 2026, Ling-3.0-flash 23 July 2026.

Ling-3.0-flash vs UI Mate 27B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Ling-3.0-flash and UI Mate 27B
FieldLing-3.0-flashInclusionAIUI Mate 27BTencent
ModelCap Index position#49#52
Index score51.748.8
EvidenceMeasuredInherited
Input price / 1M tokens$0.021Unlisted
Output price / 1M tokens$0.063Unlisted
Context window262K tokens— tokens
Max output tokens33K—
API providers listed20
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
First listed23 July 202614 August 2026
PublisherInclusionAITencent

Evidence: 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board · finetune · finetune. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Ling-3.0-flash vs UI Mate 27B

Public benchmark boards where Ling-3.0-flash or UI Mate 27B has a published result
BoardLing-3.0-flashUI Mate 27BLeads
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis37.8intelligence-index—Only one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis55.4%terminal-bench-2.1—Only one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis23.7%humanitys-last-exam—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Ling-3.0-flash vs UI Mate 27B: common questions

Is Ling-3.0-flash better than UI Mate 27B?

Ling-3.0-flash ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 3 September 2026: #49 against #52. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it.

Is Ling-3.0-flash cheaper than UI Mate 27B?

At least one of the two has no listed API price on ModelCap right now, so no price comparison is made.

Which has the bigger context window, Ling-3.0-flash or UI Mate 27B?

Both publish a 262K-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Ling-3.0-flash or UI Mate 27B?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Ling-3.0-flash and UI Mate 27B open-weight models?

Ling-3.0-flash: Open weights. UI Mate 27B: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Ling-3.0-flash and UI Mate 27B?

ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for Ling-3.0-flash and 0 for UI Mate 27B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Ling-3.0-flash vs UI Mate 27B comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 3 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further