Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Mercury 2.5 Preview vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Mercury 2.5 Preview (Inception Labs) and Qwen3 Coder Next (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 3 September 2026

As of 3 September 2026, Qwen3 Coder Next holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#91 vs #94); Mercury 2.5 Preview is 5.3× cheaper per output token ($0.15/1M vs $0.80/1M); Qwen3 Coder Next offers the longer context window (262K vs 260K tokens); and Qwen3 Coder Next ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Mercury 2.5 Preview if…

  • API cost matters — $0.15/1M output tokens against $0.80/1M, about 5.3× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.04/1M against $0.12/1M.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Mercury 2.5 Preview was listed 31 August 2026, Qwen3 Coder Next 4 February 2026.

Choose Qwen3 Coder Next if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #91 against #94 (28.0 vs 27.8 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 262K tokens against 260K.
  • you want to self-host: Qwen3 Coder Next ships open weights while Mercury 2.5 Preview is api only.
  • you want provider choice — 4 listed API providers against 1.

Mercury 2.5 Preview vs Qwen3 Coder Next: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Mercury 2.5 Preview and Qwen3 Coder Next
FieldMercury 2.5 PreviewInception LabsQwen3 Coder NextQwen
ModelCap Index position#94#91
Index score27.828.0
EvidenceEstimatedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.04$0.12
Output price / 1M tokens$0.15$0.80
Context window260K tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens66K236K
API providers listed14
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText
First listed31 August 20264 February 2026
PublisherInception LabsQwen

Evidence: start rank inherited from the measured predecessor in its own product family, less a fixed succession penalty, until independent measurements replace it · 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Mercury 2.5 Preview vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Public benchmark boards where Mercury 2.5 Preview or Qwen3 Coder Next has a published result
BoardMercury 2.5 PreviewQwen3 Coder NextLeads
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis21.3intelligence-indexOnly one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis38.2%terminal-bench-2.1Only one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis79.5%tau2-bench-telecomOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis10.1%humanitys-last-examOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Mercury 2.5 Preview vs Qwen3 Coder Next: common questions

Is Mercury 2.5 Preview better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 3 September 2026: #91 against #94. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it.

Is Mercury 2.5 Preview cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Mercury 2.5 Preview is cheaper on output tokens: $0.15/1M against $0.80/1M. Input tokens are $0.04/1M for Mercury 2.5 Preview and $0.12/1M for Qwen3 Coder Next. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens.

Which has the bigger context window, Mercury 2.5 Preview or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next has the larger context window: 262K tokens against 260K.

Which is better for coding, Mercury 2.5 Preview or Qwen3 Coder Next?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Mercury 2.5 Preview and Qwen3 Coder Next open-weight models?

Mercury 2.5 Preview: API only. Qwen3 Coder Next: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Mercury 2.5 Preview and Qwen3 Coder Next?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Mercury 2.5 Preview and 4 for Qwen3 Coder Next, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Mercury 2.5 Preview vs Qwen3 Coder Next comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 3 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further