Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Gemma 4 31B vs Ornith 1.0 9B

Gemma 4 31B (Google) and Ornith 1.0 9B (Ornith Ai) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 17 August 2026

As of 17 August 2026, Gemma 4 31B holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#30 vs #33).

Which should you choose?

Choose Gemma 4 31B if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #30 against #33 (60.0 vs 57.7 points).
  • you want provider choice — 16 listed API providers against 0.

Choose Ornith 1.0 9B if…

  • you want the more recently listed model — Ornith 1.0 9B was listed 21 June 2026, Gemma 4 31B 2 April 2026.

Gemma 4 31B vs Ornith 1.0 9B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Gemma 4 31B and Ornith 1.0 9B
FieldGemma 4 31BGoogleOrnith 1.0 9BOrnith Ai
ModelCap Index position#30#33
Index score60.057.7
EvidenceMeasuredEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$0.10Unlisted
Output price / 1M tokens$0.34Unlisted
Context window262K tokens— tokens
Max output tokens262K—
API providers listed160
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesImage, Text, VideoText
First listed2 April 202621 June 2026
PublisherGoogleOrnith Ai

Evidence: 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards · start rank interpolated from the launch card's own comparison table against resolved catalogue peers, discounted for measured cross-lab optimism. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Gemma 4 31B vs Ornith 1.0 9B

Public benchmark boards where Gemma 4 31B or Ornith 1.0 9B has a published result
BoardGemma 4 31BOrnith 1.0 9BLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14991483–1514—Only one result
LMArena AgentLMArena-18.9%-21.7%–-16.0%—Only one result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis29.7intelligence-index—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Gemma 4 31B vs Ornith 1.0 9B: common questions

Is Gemma 4 31B better than Ornith 1.0 9B?

Gemma 4 31B ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 17 August 2026: #30 against #33. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it.

Is Gemma 4 31B cheaper than Ornith 1.0 9B?

At least one of the two has no listed API price on ModelCap right now, so no price comparison is made.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 4 31B or Ornith 1.0 9B?

Both publish a 262K-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 31B or Ornith 1.0 9B?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Gemma 4 31B and Ornith 1.0 9B open-weight models?

Gemma 4 31B: Open weights. Ornith 1.0 9B: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Gemma 4 31B and Ornith 1.0 9B?

ModelCap currently lists 16 API providers for Gemma 4 31B and 0 for Ornith 1.0 9B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Gemma 4 31B vs Ornith 1.0 9B comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 17 August 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further