Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Gemma 3 12B vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Gemma 3 12B (Google) and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 18 August 2026

As of 18 August 2026, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#100 vs #175); Gemma 3 12B is 16× cheaper per output token ($0.15/1M vs $2.40/1M); Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking offers the longer context window (262K vs 131K tokens); and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Gemma 3 12B if…

  • API cost matters — $0.15/1M output tokens against $2.40/1M, about 16× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.05/1M against $0.20/1M.

Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #100 against #175 (23.7 vs 20.3 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 262K tokens against 131K.
  • you want to self-host: Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ships open weights while Gemma 3 12B is gated access.
  • you want provider choice — 2 listed API providers against 1.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking was listed 6 October 2025, Gemma 3 12B 13 March 2025.

Gemma 3 12B vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Gemma 3 12B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
FieldGemma 3 12BGoogleQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingQwen
ModelCap Index position#175#100
Index score20.323.7
EvidenceMeasuredEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$0.05$0.20
Output price / 1M tokens$0.15$2.40
Context window131K tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens16K33K
API providers listed12
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
First listed13 March 20256 October 2025
PublisherGoogleQwen

Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · publisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Gemma 3 12B vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Public benchmark boards where Gemma 3 12B or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking has a published result
BoardGemma 3 12BQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)13161293–1340—Only one result
BFCL V4UC Berkeley (Gorilla)30.4Prompt—Only one result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis5.5intelligence-index—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Gemma 3 12B vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: common questions

Is Gemma 3 12B better than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 18 August 2026: #100 against #175. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it.

Is Gemma 3 12B cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Gemma 3 12B is cheaper on output tokens: $0.15/1M against $2.40/1M. Input tokens are $0.05/1M for Gemma 3 12B and $0.20/1M for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 3 12B or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking has the larger context window: 262K tokens against 131K.

Which is better for coding, Gemma 3 12B or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Gemma 3 12B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking open-weight models?

Gemma 3 12B: Gated access. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Gemma 3 12B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Gemma 3 12B and 2 for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Gemma 3 12B vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 18 August 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further