Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs Gemma 3 27B

Gemini 4 Argon (Google) and Gemma 3 27B (Google) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 14 October 2026

As of 14 October 2026, Gemini 4 Argon holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#1 vs #144); Gemma 3 27B is 22.2× cheaper per output token ($0.45/1M vs $10.00/1M); and Gemini 4 Argon offers the longer context window (1M vs 131K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Gemini 4 Argon if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #1 against #144 (88.6 vs 43.7 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 131K.
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1525 against 1365.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1561 against 1357.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Gemini 4 Argon was listed 13 October 2026, Gemma 3 27B 12 March 2025.

Choose Gemma 3 27B if…

  • API cost matters — $0.45/1M output tokens against $10.00/1M, about 22.2× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.08/1M against $2.00/1M.
  • you want provider choice — 5 listed API providers against 2.

Gemini 4 Argon vs Gemma 3 27B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Gemini 4 Argon and Gemma 3 27B
FieldGemini 4 ArgonGoogleGemma 3 27BGoogle
ModelCap Index position#1#144
Index score88.643.7
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$2.00$0.08
Output price / 1M tokens$10.00$0.45
Context window1M tokens131K tokens
Declared route output cap66K118K
API providers listed25
Weight accessNo linked weightsGated access
Input modalitiesAudio, File, Image, Text, VideoText, Image
First listed13 October 202612 March 2025
PublisherGoogleGoogle

Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Gemini 4 Argon vs Gemma 3 27B

Public benchmark boards where Gemini 4 Argon or Gemma 3 27B has a published result
BoardGemini 4 ArgonGemma 3 27BLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)15251516–1534High13651362–1369Not reportedGemini 4 Argon
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15611543–1578High13571350–1364Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena AgentLMArena13.6%12.0%–15.2%High—Only one result
BFCL V4UC Berkeley (Gorilla)—29.5PromptOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis52.6High—Only one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis57.1%High—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Gemini 4 Argon vs Gemma 3 27B: common questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Gemma 3 27B?

Gemini 4 Argon ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 14 October 2026: #1 against #144. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.

Is Gemini 4 Argon cheaper than Gemma 3 27B?

Gemma 3 27B is cheaper on output tokens: $0.45/1M against $10.00/1M. Input tokens are $2.00/1M for Gemini 4 Argon and $0.08/1M for Gemma 3 27B. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $9.00 for Gemini 4 Argon versus $0.39 for Gemma 3 27B. Gemma 3 27B costs 95.7% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 4 Argon or Gemma 3 27B?

Gemini 4 Argon has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 131K. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 4 Argon or Gemma 3 27B?

Arena coding: Gemini 4 Argon 1561, Gemma 3 27B 1357 — Gemini 4 Argon leads.

Are Gemini 4 Argon and Gemma 3 27B open-weight models?

Gemini 4 Argon: No linked weights. Gemma 3 27B: Gated access. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Gemini 4 Argon and Gemma 3 27B?

ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for Gemini 4 Argon and 5 for Gemma 3 27B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Gemini 4 Argon vs Gemma 3 27B comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 14 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further