Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

Gemini 3.8 Flash (Google) and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent (xAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 18 October 2026

As of 18 October 2026, Gemini 3.8 Flash holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#5 vs #22); Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is 1.7× cheaper per output token ($2.50/1M vs $4.13/1M); and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers the longer context window (2M vs 1M tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #5 against #22 (83.5 vs 77.4 points).
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.825/1M against $1.25/1M.
  • you want provider choice — 2 listed API providers against 1.
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1496 against 1470.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1528 against 1508.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Gemini 3.8 Flash was listed 2 September 2026, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent 31 March 2026.

Choose Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent if…

  • API cost matters — $2.50/1M output tokens against $4.13/1M, about 1.7× cheaper.
  • you need the longer context window — 2M tokens against 1M.

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Gemini 3.8 Flash and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
FieldGemini 3.8 FlashGoogleGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentxAI
ModelCap Index position#5#22
Index score83.577.4
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.825$1.25
Output price / 1M tokens$4.13$2.50
Context window1M tokens2M tokens
Declared route output cap66K1.8M
API providers listed21
Weight accessNo linked weightsNo linked weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, File, AudioText, Image, File
First listed2 September 202631 March 2026
PublisherGooglexAI

Evidence: 5 public benchmark observations across 5 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

Public benchmark boards where Gemini 3.8 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has a published result
BoardGemini 3.8 FlashGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14961492–1501High14701467–1474Beta · 0309Gemini 3.8 Flash
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15281521–1535High15081502–1514Beta · 0309Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena AgentLMArena3.7%2.6%–4.8%High—Only one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation89.2%High—Only one result
ARC-AGI-3ARC Prize Foundation10.4%High—Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis40.9High—Only one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis87.6%High—Only one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis47.8%High—Only one result
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)19.1%15.7%–22.5%mini-SWE-agent · High—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: common questions

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Gemini 3.8 Flash ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 18 October 2026: #5 against #22. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash cheaper than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper on output tokens: $2.50/1M against $4.13/1M. Input tokens are $0.825/1M for Gemini 3.8 Flash and $1.25/1M for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $3.71 for Gemini 3.8 Flash versus $3.75 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent. Gemini 3.8 Flash costs 1.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has the larger context window: 2M tokens against 1M. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Arena coding: Gemini 3.8 Flash 1528, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent 1508 — Gemini 3.8 Flash leads.

Are Gemini 3.8 Flash and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent open-weight models?

Gemini 3.8 Flash: No linked weights. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Gemini 3.8 Flash and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 1 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 18 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further