Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (Google) and Kimi K2.7 Code (Moonshot AI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 17 August 2026

As of 17 August 2026, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#21 vs #26); Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is 1.4× cheaper per output token ($2.50/1M vs $3.50/1M); and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite offers the longer context window (1M vs 262K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #21 against #26 (65.7 vs 63.2 points).
  • API cost matters — $2.50/1M output tokens against $3.50/1M, about 1.4× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.30/1M against $0.71/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 262K.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite was listed 21 July 2026, Kimi K2.7 Code 12 June 2026.

Choose Kimi K2.7 Code if…

  • you want provider choice — 14 listed API providers against 2.
  • LMArena Agent is your yardstick — 1.1% against -10.4%.
  • Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 43.0 against 37.4.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Kimi K2.7 Code: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Kimi K2.7 Code
FieldGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogleKimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI
ModelCap Index position#21#26
Index score65.763.2
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.30$0.71
Output price / 1M tokens$2.50$3.50
Context window1M tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens66K262K
API providers listed214
Weight accessAPI onlyRestricted license
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, File, AudioText, Image
First listed21 July 202612 June 2026
PublisherGoogleMoonshot AI

Evidence: 5 public benchmark observations across 5 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Public benchmark boards where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Kimi K2.7 Code has a published result
BoardGemini 3.5 Flash LiteKimi K2.7 CodeLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15031493–1513Only one result
LMArena AgentLMArena-10.4%-11.6%–-9.2%1.1%-1.1%–3.2%Kimi K2.7 Code
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation10.3%HighOnly one result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis37.4intelligence-index43.0intelligence-indexKimi K2.7 Code

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Kimi K2.7 Code: common questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 17 August 2026: #21 against #26. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite cheaper than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper on output tokens: $2.50/1M against $3.50/1M. Input tokens are $0.30/1M for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and $0.71/1M for Kimi K2.7 Code. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 262K.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Kimi K2.7 Code?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Kimi K2.7 Code open-weight models?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: API only. Kimi K2.7 Code: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Kimi K2.7 Code?

ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 14 for Kimi K2.7 Code, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Kimi K2.7 Code comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 17 August 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further