Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Grok 4.6

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (DeepSeek) and Grok 4.6 (xAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 9 September 2026

As of 9 September 2026, Grok 4.6 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#16 vs #23); DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is 9.1× cheaper per output token ($0.66/1M vs $6.00/1M); DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp offers the longer context window (1M vs 500K tokens); and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp if…

  • API cost matters — $0.66/1M output tokens against $6.00/1M, about 9.1× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.22/1M against $2.00/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 500K.
  • you want to self-host: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp ships open weights while Grok 4.6 is api only.
  • you want provider choice — 6 listed API providers against 2.
  • you want the more recently listed model — DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp was listed 21 August 2026, Grok 4.6 12 August 2026.

Choose Grok 4.6 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #16 against #23 (75.8 vs 71.2 points).

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Grok 4.6: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Grok 4.6
FieldDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeekGrok 4.6xAI
ModelCap Index position#23#16
Index score71.275.8
EvidenceEstimatedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.22$2.00
Output price / 1M tokens$0.66$6.00
Context window1M tokens500K tokens
Max output tokens944K450K
API providers listed62
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, File
First listed21 August 202612 August 2026
PublisherDeepSeekxAI

Evidence: publisher-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (13%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 7 rows (87%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 7 rows; no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 2 toward the measured corpus · 5 public benchmark observations across 5 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Grok 4.6

Public benchmark boards where DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Grok 4.6 has a published result
BoardDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGrok 4.6Leads
LMArena AgentLMArena3.2%2.1%–4.4%X-HighOnly one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation67.1%X-HighOnly one result
ARC-AGI-3ARC Prize Foundation2.1%X-HighOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis44.4intelligence-index:v4.3:highOnly one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis88.4%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Grok 4.6 (high)":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis42.9%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Grok 4.6 (high)":reasoning=trueOnly one result
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)20.3%17.2%–23.4%Grok Build · HighOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Grok 4.6: common questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp better than Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #16 against #23. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp cheaper than Grok 4.6?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is cheaper on output tokens: $0.66/1M against $6.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.22/1M for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and $2.00/1M for Grok 4.6. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.77 for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp versus $7.00 for Grok 4.6. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs 89.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Grok 4.6?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 500K.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Grok 4.6?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Grok 4.6 open-weight models?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp: Open weights. Grok 4.6: API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Grok 4.6?

ModelCap currently lists 6 API providers for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and 2 for Grok 4.6, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Grok 4.6 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further