Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Muse Spark 1.3

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (DeepSeek) and Muse Spark 1.3 (Meta) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 9 September 2026

As of 9 September 2026, Muse Spark 1.3 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#2 vs #23); DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is 6.4× cheaper per output token ($0.66/1M vs $4.25/1M); and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp if…

  • API cost matters — $0.66/1M output tokens against $4.25/1M, about 6.4× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.22/1M against $1.25/1M.
  • you want to self-host: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp ships open weights while Muse Spark 1.3 is api only.
  • you want provider choice — 6 listed API providers against 1.

Choose Muse Spark 1.3 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #2 against #23 (88.7 vs 71.2 points).
  • you want the more recently listed model — Muse Spark 1.3 was listed 2 September 2026, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp 21 August 2026.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Muse Spark 1.3: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Muse Spark 1.3
FieldDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeekMuse Spark 1.3Meta
ModelCap Index position#23#2
Index score71.288.7
EvidenceEstimatedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.22$1.25
Output price / 1M tokens$0.66$4.25
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens944K944K
API providers listed61
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video, File, Audio
First listed21 August 20262 September 2026
PublisherDeepSeekMeta

Evidence: publisher-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (13%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 7 rows (87%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 7 rows; no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 2 toward the measured corpus · 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Muse Spark 1.3

Public benchmark boards where DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Muse Spark 1.3 has a published result
BoardDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpMuse Spark 1.3Leads
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis48.2intelligence-index:v4.3:maxOnly one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis84.3%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Muse Spark 1.3 (max)":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis48.7%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Muse Spark 1.3 (max)":reasoning=trueOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Muse Spark 1.3: common questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp better than Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #2 against #23. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp cheaper than Muse Spark 1.3?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is cheaper on output tokens: $0.66/1M against $4.25/1M. Input tokens are $0.22/1M for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and $1.25/1M for Muse Spark 1.3. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.77 for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp versus $4.63 for Muse Spark 1.3. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs 83.4% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Muse Spark 1.3?

Both publish a 1M-token context window.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Muse Spark 1.3?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Muse Spark 1.3 open-weight models?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp: Open weights. Muse Spark 1.3: API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Muse Spark 1.3?

ModelCap currently lists 6 API providers for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and 1 for Muse Spark 1.3, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Muse Spark 1.3 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further