Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek) and Laguna XS 2.1 (Poolside) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 15 September 2026

As of 15 September 2026, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#21 vs #81); Laguna XS 2.1 is 5× cheaper per output token ($0.12/1M vs $0.60/1M); DeepSeek V4.1 Flash offers the longer context window (1M vs 262K tokens); and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #21 against #81 (75.1 vs 50.8 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 262K.
  • you want to self-host: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ships open weights while Laguna XS 2.1 is restricted license.
  • you want provider choice — 17 listed API providers against 1.
  • you want the more recently listed model — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash was listed 10 September 2026, Laguna XS 2.1 2 July 2026.

Choose Laguna XS 2.1 if…

  • API cost matters — $0.12/1M output tokens against $0.60/1M, about 5× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.06/1M against $0.15/1M.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Laguna XS 2.1
FieldDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekLaguna XS 2.1Poolside
ModelCap Index position#21#81
Index score75.150.8
EvidenceMeasuredEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$0.15$0.06
Output price / 1M tokens$0.60$0.12
Context window1M tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens384K33K
API providers listed171
Weight accessOpen weightsRestricted license
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
First listed10 September 20262 July 2026
PublisherDeepSeekPoolside

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 3 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (27%); global-corpus-prior over 193 held-out anchors (73%); shrunk 3.8 up toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1

Public benchmark boards where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Laguna XS 2.1 has a published result
BoardDeepSeek V4.1 FlashLaguna XS 2.1Leads
LMArena AgentLMArena4.9%3.0%–6.7%MaxOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis39.5intelligence-index:v4.3:maxOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis39.2%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)":reasoning=trueOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1: common questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Laguna XS 2.1?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 15 September 2026: #21 against #81. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cheaper than Laguna XS 2.1?

Laguna XS 2.1 is cheaper on output tokens: $0.12/1M against $0.60/1M. Input tokens are $0.15/1M for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and $0.06/1M for Laguna XS 2.1. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.60 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash versus $0.18 for Laguna XS 2.1. Laguna XS 2.1 costs 70.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Laguna XS 2.1?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 262K.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Laguna XS 2.1?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Laguna XS 2.1 open-weight models?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Open weights. Laguna XS 2.1: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Laguna XS 2.1?

ModelCap currently lists 17 API providers for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and 1 for Laguna XS 2.1, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 15 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further