Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 Code

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek) and Kimi K2.7 Code (Moonshot AI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 15 September 2026

As of 15 September 2026, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#21 vs #55); DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 5.8× cheaper per output token ($0.60/1M vs $3.50/1M); DeepSeek V4.1 Flash offers the longer context window (1M vs 262K tokens); and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #21 against #55 (75.1 vs 58.5 points).
  • API cost matters — $0.60/1M output tokens against $3.50/1M, about 5.8× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.15/1M against $0.71/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 262K.
  • you want to self-host: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ships open weights while Kimi K2.7 Code is restricted license.
  • you want provider choice — 17 listed API providers against 14.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 39.5 against 26.3.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 39.2% against 35.0%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash was listed 10 September 2026, Kimi K2.7 Code 12 June 2026.

Choose Kimi K2.7 Code if…

  • ModelCap publishes no field on which Kimi K2.7 Code leads DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for this pair.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 Code: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Kimi K2.7 Code
FieldDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekKimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI
ModelCap Index position#21#55
Index score75.158.5
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.15$0.71
Output price / 1M tokens$0.60$3.50
Context window1M tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens384K236K
API providers listed1714
Weight accessOpen weightsRestricted license
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
First listed10 September 202612 June 2026
PublisherDeepSeekMoonshot AI

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Public benchmark boards where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Kimi K2.7 Code has a published result
BoardDeepSeek V4.1 FlashKimi K2.7 CodeLeads
LMArena AgentLMArena4.9%3.0%–6.7%MaxOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis39.5intelligence-index:v4.3:max26.3intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis90.1%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Kimi K2.7 Code":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis39.2%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)":reasoning=true35.0%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Kimi K2.7 Code":reasoning=trueDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
WildClawBench OpenClawWildClawBench46.9Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 Code: common questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 15 September 2026: #21 against #55. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cheaper than Kimi K2.7 Code?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $0.60/1M against $3.50/1M. Input tokens are $0.15/1M for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and $0.71/1M for Kimi K2.7 Code. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.60 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash versus $3.17 for Kimi K2.7 Code. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs 81.1% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Kimi K2.7 Code?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 262K.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Kimi K2.7 Code?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Kimi K2.7 Code open-weight models?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Open weights. Kimi K2.7 Code: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Kimi K2.7 Code?

ModelCap currently lists 17 API providers for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and 14 for Kimi K2.7 Code, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 Code comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 15 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further