Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 31B

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek) and Gemma 4 31B (Google) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 12 September 2026

As of 12 September 2026, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#16 vs #28); Gemma 4 31B is 1.8× cheaper per output token ($0.34/1M vs $0.60/1M); and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash offers the longer context window (1M vs 262K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #16 against #28 (76.6 vs 68.9 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 262K.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 39.2% against 11.8%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash was listed 10 September 2026, Gemma 4 31B 2 April 2026.

Choose Gemma 4 31B if…

  • API cost matters — $0.34/1M output tokens against $0.60/1M, about 1.8× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.09/1M against $0.15/1M.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 31B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Gemma 4 31B
FieldDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekGemma 4 31BGoogle
ModelCap Index position#16#28
Index score76.668.9
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.15$0.09
Output price / 1M tokens$0.60$0.34
Context window1M tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens384K16K
API providers listed1212
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, ImageImage, Text, Video
First listed10 September 20262 April 2026
PublisherDeepSeekGoogle

Evidence: 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 31B

Public benchmark boards where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Gemma 4 31B has a published result
BoardDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 4 31BLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14991483–1514Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis39.5intelligence-index:v4.3:maxOnly one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis29.2%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=falseOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis65.5%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=falseOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis39.2%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max)":reasoning=true11.8%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=falseDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
WildClawBench OpenClawWildClawBench37.6Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 31B: common questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Gemma 4 31B?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 12 September 2026: #16 against #28. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cheaper than Gemma 4 31B?

Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on output tokens: $0.34/1M against $0.60/1M. Input tokens are $0.15/1M for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and $0.09/1M for Gemma 4 31B. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.60 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash versus $0.35 for Gemma 4 31B. Gemma 4 31B costs 41.7% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Gemma 4 31B?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 262K.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Gemma 4 31B?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Gemma 4 31B open-weight models?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Open weights. Gemma 4 31B: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Gemma 4 31B?

ModelCap currently lists 12 API providers for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and 12 for Gemma 4 31B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 31B comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 12 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further