Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

North Mini Code vs Step 3.7 Flash

North Mini Code (Cohere) and Step 3.7 Flash (StepFun) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 19 September 2026

As of 19 September 2026, Step 3.7 Flash holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#97 vs #98); North Mini Code is cheaper per output token (Free/1M vs $1.15/1M); and Step 3.7 Flash offers the longer context window (262K vs 256K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose North Mini Code if…

  • API cost matters — Free/1M output tokens against $1.15/1M.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost Free/1M against $0.20/1M.
  • you want the more recently listed model — North Mini Code was listed 17 June 2026, Step 3.7 Flash 28 May 2026.

Choose Step 3.7 Flash if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #97 against #98 (49.2 vs 49.1 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 262K tokens against 256K.
  • you want provider choice — 3 listed API providers against 1.
  • AA τ²-Bench Telecom is your yardstick — 98.5% against 37.4%.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 21.4% against 11.1%.

North Mini Code vs Step 3.7 Flash: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of North Mini Code and Step 3.7 Flash
FieldNorth Mini CodeCohereStep 3.7 FlashStepFun
ModelCap Index position#98#97
Index score49.149.2
EvidenceMeasuredEstimated
Input price / 1M tokensFree$0.20
Output price / 1M tokensFree$1.15
Context window256K tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens64K230K
API providers listed13
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
First listed17 June 202628 May 2026
PublisherCohereStepFun

Evidence: 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board · 3 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (17%); global-corpus-prior over 195 held-out anchors (18%); measured predecessor stepfun/step-3.5-flash less the succession penalty (65%); shrunk 0.8 up toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: North Mini Code vs Step 3.7 Flash

Public benchmark boards where North Mini Code or Step 3.7 Flash has a published result
BoardNorth Mini CodeStep 3.7 FlashLeads
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis9.9intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis37.4%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="North Mini Code":reasoning=true98.5%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Step 3.7 Flash":reasoning=trueStep 3.7 Flash
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis11.1%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="North Mini Code":reasoning=true21.4%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Step 3.7 Flash":reasoning=trueStep 3.7 Flash

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

North Mini Code vs Step 3.7 Flash: common questions

Is North Mini Code better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 19 September 2026: #97 against #98. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is North Mini Code cheaper than Step 3.7 Flash?

North Mini Code is cheaper on output tokens: Free/1M against $1.15/1M. Input tokens are Free/1M for North Mini Code and $0.20/1M for Step 3.7 Flash. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0 for North Mini Code versus $0.97 for Step 3.7 Flash. North Mini Code costs 100.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, North Mini Code or Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash has the larger context window: 262K tokens against 256K.

Which is better for coding, North Mini Code or Step 3.7 Flash?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are North Mini Code and Step 3.7 Flash open-weight models?

North Mini Code: Open weights. Step 3.7 Flash: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run North Mini Code and Step 3.7 Flash?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for North Mini Code and 3 for Step 3.7 Flash, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this North Mini Code vs Step 3.7 Flash comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 19 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further