Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

North Mini Code vs Gemma 3 27B

North Mini Code (Cohere) and Gemma 3 27B (Google) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 13 September 2026

As of 13 September 2026, Gemma 3 27B holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#117 vs #129); North Mini Code is cheaper per output token (Free/1M vs $0.45/1M); North Mini Code offers the longer context window (256K vs 131K tokens); and North Mini Code ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose North Mini Code if…

  • API cost matters — Free/1M output tokens against $0.45/1M.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost Free/1M against $0.08/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 256K tokens against 131K.
  • you want to self-host: North Mini Code ships open weights while Gemma 3 27B is gated access.
  • you want the more recently listed model — North Mini Code was listed 17 June 2026, Gemma 3 27B 12 March 2025.

Choose Gemma 3 27B if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #117 against #129 (37.7 vs 33.6 points).
  • you want provider choice — 4 listed API providers against 1.

North Mini Code vs Gemma 3 27B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of North Mini Code and Gemma 3 27B
FieldNorth Mini CodeCohereGemma 3 27BGoogle
ModelCap Index position#129#117
Index score33.637.7
EvidenceEstimatedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokensFree$0.08
Output price / 1M tokensFree$0.45
Context window256K tokens131K tokens
Max output tokens64K118K
API providers listed14
Weight accessOpen weightsGated access
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
First listed17 June 202612 March 2025
PublisherCohereGoogle

Evidence: 3 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (57%); publisher-corpus-prior over 186 held-out anchors (43%); shrunk 13.7 toward the measured corpus · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: North Mini Code vs Gemma 3 27B

Public benchmark boards where North Mini Code or Gemma 3 27B has a published result
BoardNorth Mini CodeGemma 3 27BLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)13581351–1365Only one result
BFCL V4UC Berkeley (Gorilla)29.5PromptOnly one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis35.6%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="North Mini Code":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis37.4%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="North Mini Code":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis11.1%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="North Mini Code":reasoning=trueOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

North Mini Code vs Gemma 3 27B: common questions

Is North Mini Code better than Gemma 3 27B?

Gemma 3 27B ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 13 September 2026: #117 against #129. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is North Mini Code cheaper than Gemma 3 27B?

North Mini Code is cheaper on output tokens: Free/1M against $0.45/1M. Input tokens are Free/1M for North Mini Code and $0.08/1M for Gemma 3 27B. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0 for North Mini Code versus $0.39 for Gemma 3 27B. North Mini Code costs 100.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, North Mini Code or Gemma 3 27B?

North Mini Code has the larger context window: 256K tokens against 131K.

Which is better for coding, North Mini Code or Gemma 3 27B?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are North Mini Code and Gemma 3 27B open-weight models?

North Mini Code: Open weights. Gemma 3 27B: Gated access. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run North Mini Code and Gemma 3 27B?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for North Mini Code and 4 for Gemma 3 27B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this North Mini Code vs Gemma 3 27B comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 13 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further