Command R (08-2024) (Cohere) and Command R+ (08-2024) (Cohere) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.
Snapshot as of 6 November 2026
As of 6 November 2026, Command R+ (08-2024) holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#279 vs #292); and Command R (08-2024) is 16.7× cheaper per output token ($0.60/1M vs $10.00/1M).
Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.
Benchmark scores: Command R (08-2024) vs Command R+ (08-2024)
Public benchmark boards where Command R (08-2024) or Command R+ (08-2024) has a published result
Command R (08-2024) vs Command R+ (08-2024): common questions
Is Command R (08-2024) better than Command R+ (08-2024)?
Command R+ (08-2024) ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 6 November 2026: #279 against #292. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
Is Command R (08-2024) cheaper than Command R+ (08-2024)?
Command R (08-2024) is cheaper on output tokens: $0.60/1M against $10.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.15/1M for Command R (08-2024) and $2.50/1M for Command R+ (08-2024). Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.60 for Command R (08-2024) versus $10.00 for Command R+ (08-2024). Command R (08-2024) costs 94.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
Which has the bigger context window, Command R (08-2024) or Command R+ (08-2024)?
Both publish a 128K-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.
Which is better for coding, Command R (08-2024) or Command R+ (08-2024)?
Arena coding: Command R (08-2024) 1281, Command R+ (08-2024) 1280 — Command R (08-2024) leads.
Are Command R (08-2024) and Command R+ (08-2024) open-weight models?
Command R (08-2024): No linked weights. Command R+ (08-2024): No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.
Where can I run Command R (08-2024) and Command R+ (08-2024)?
ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Command R (08-2024) and 1 for Command R+ (08-2024), from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.
How current is this Command R (08-2024) vs Command R+ (08-2024) comparison?
Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 6 November 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.