Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Seed 2.1 Turbo vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Seed 2.1 Turbo (ByteDance Seed) and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (DeepSeek) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 10 September 2026

As of 10 September 2026, Seed 2.1 Turbo holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#18 vs #26); DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 13.9× cheaper per output token ($0.18/1M vs $2.50/1M); DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers the longer context window (1.3M vs 262K tokens); and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Seed 2.1 Turbo if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #18 against #26 (76.8 vs 71.2 points).
  • you want the more recently listed model — Seed 2.1 Turbo was listed 12 August 2026, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 31 July 2026.

Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 if…

  • API cost matters — $0.18/1M output tokens against $2.50/1M, about 13.9× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.065/1M against $0.50/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 1.3M tokens against 262K.
  • you want to self-host: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ships open weights while Seed 2.1 Turbo is api only.
  • you want provider choice — 27 listed API providers against 1.

Seed 2.1 Turbo vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Seed 2.1 Turbo and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
FieldSeed 2.1 TurboByteDance SeedDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeek
ModelCap Index position#18#26
Index score76.871.2
EvidenceEstimatedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.50$0.065
Output price / 1M tokens$2.50$0.18
Context window262K tokens1.3M tokens
Max output tokens236K944K
API providers listed127
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
First listed12 August 202631 July 2026
PublisherByteDance SeedDeepSeek

Evidence: global-corpus-prior over 185 held-out anchors (12%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 3 rows (88%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 3 rows; no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 3.1 toward the measured corpus · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Public benchmark boards where Seed 2.1 Turbo or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has a published result
BoardSeed 2.1 TurboDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Leads
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation61.4%MaxOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis34.5intelligence-index:v4.3:maxOnly one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis78.7%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max)":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis38.6%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max)":reasoning=trueOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Seed 2.1 Turbo vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: common questions

Is Seed 2.1 Turbo better than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?

Seed 2.1 Turbo ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 10 September 2026: #18 against #26. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Seed 2.1 Turbo cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper on output tokens: $0.18/1M against $2.50/1M. Input tokens are $0.50/1M for Seed 2.1 Turbo and $0.065/1M for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $2.25 for Seed 2.1 Turbo versus $0.22 for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs 90.2% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Seed 2.1 Turbo or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the larger context window: 1.3M tokens against 262K.

Which is better for coding, Seed 2.1 Turbo or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Seed 2.1 Turbo and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 open-weight models?

Seed 2.1 Turbo: API only. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Seed 2.1 Turbo and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Seed 2.1 Turbo and 27 for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Seed 2.1 Turbo vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 10 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further