Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Seed 1.6 Flash vs Seed 2.1 Turbo

Seed 1.6 Flash (ByteDance Seed) and Seed 2.1 Turbo (ByteDance Seed) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 17 August 2026

As of 17 August 2026, Seed 1.6 Flash holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#121 vs #123); and Seed 1.6 Flash is 8.3× cheaper per output token ($0.30/1M vs $2.50/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose Seed 1.6 Flash if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #121 against #123 (22.5 vs 22.5 points).
  • API cost matters — $0.30/1M output tokens against $2.50/1M, about 8.3× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.075/1M against $0.50/1M.

Choose Seed 2.1 Turbo if…

  • you want the more recently listed model — Seed 2.1 Turbo was listed 12 August 2026, Seed 1.6 Flash 23 December 2025.

Seed 1.6 Flash vs Seed 2.1 Turbo: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Seed 1.6 Flash and Seed 2.1 Turbo
FieldSeed 1.6 FlashByteDance SeedSeed 2.1 TurboByteDance Seed
ModelCap Index position#121#123
Index score22.522.5
EvidenceEstimatedEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$0.075$0.50
Output price / 1M tokens$0.30$2.50
Context window262K tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens33K262K
API providers listed11
Weight accessAPI onlyAPI only
Input modalitiesImage, Text, VideoText, Image, Video
First listed23 December 202512 August 2026
PublisherByteDance SeedByteDance Seed

Evidence: global corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated · global corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Seed 1.6 Flash vs Seed 2.1 Turbo

Neither model has a published result on a public benchmark board ModelCap tracks yet.

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Seed 1.6 Flash vs Seed 2.1 Turbo: common questions

Is Seed 1.6 Flash better than Seed 2.1 Turbo?

Seed 1.6 Flash ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 17 August 2026: #121 against #123. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it.

Is Seed 1.6 Flash cheaper than Seed 2.1 Turbo?

Seed 1.6 Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $0.30/1M against $2.50/1M. Input tokens are $0.075/1M for Seed 1.6 Flash and $0.50/1M for Seed 2.1 Turbo. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens.

Which has the bigger context window, Seed 1.6 Flash or Seed 2.1 Turbo?

Both publish a 262K-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Seed 1.6 Flash or Seed 2.1 Turbo?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Seed 1.6 Flash and Seed 2.1 Turbo open-weight models?

Seed 1.6 Flash: API only. Seed 2.1 Turbo: API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Seed 1.6 Flash and Seed 2.1 Turbo?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Seed 1.6 Flash and 1 for Seed 2.1 Turbo, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Seed 1.6 Flash vs Seed 2.1 Turbo comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 17 August 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further