Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Ouro 1.4B vs aya vision 32b

Ouro 1.4B (ByteDance) and aya vision 32b (CohereLabs) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 3 September 2026

As of 3 September 2026, Ouro 1.4B holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#133 vs #136); and Ouro 1.4B ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Ouro 1.4B if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #133 against #136 (23.0 vs 23.0 points).
  • you want to self-host: Ouro 1.4B ships open weights while aya vision 32b is gated access.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Ouro 1.4B was listed 28 October 2025, aya vision 32b 2 March 2025.

Choose aya vision 32b if…

  • ModelCap publishes no field on which aya vision 32b leads Ouro 1.4B for this pair.

Ouro 1.4B vs aya vision 32b: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Ouro 1.4B and aya vision 32b
FieldOuro 1.4BByteDanceaya vision 32bCohereLabs
ModelCap Index position#133#136
Index score23.023.0
EvidenceEstimatedEstimated
Input price / 1M tokensUnlistedUnlisted
Output price / 1M tokensUnlistedUnlisted
Context window— tokens— tokens
Max output tokens——
API providers listed00
Weight accessOpen weightsGated access
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
First listed28 October 20252 March 2025
PublisherByteDanceCohereLabs

Evidence: global corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated · global corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Ouro 1.4B vs aya vision 32b

Neither model has a published result on a public benchmark board ModelCap tracks yet.

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Ouro 1.4B vs aya vision 32b: common questions

Is Ouro 1.4B better than aya vision 32b?

Ouro 1.4B ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 3 September 2026: #133 against #136. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it.

Is Ouro 1.4B cheaper than aya vision 32b?

At least one of the two has no listed API price on ModelCap right now, so no price comparison is made.

Which has the bigger context window, Ouro 1.4B or aya vision 32b?

Both publish a —-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Ouro 1.4B or aya vision 32b?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Ouro 1.4B and aya vision 32b open-weight models?

Ouro 1.4B: Open weights. aya vision 32b: Gated access. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Ouro 1.4B and aya vision 32b?

ModelCap currently lists 0 API providers for Ouro 1.4B and 0 for aya vision 32b, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Ouro 1.4B vs aya vision 32b comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 3 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further