Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Trinity Large Thinking vs Solar Pro 4

Trinity Large Thinking (Arcee AI) and Solar Pro 4 (Upstage) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 19 September 2026

As of 19 September 2026, Solar Pro 4 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#109 vs #111); Solar Pro 4 is 2.2× cheaper per output token ($0.36/1M vs $0.80/1M); and Solar Pro 4 offers the longer context window (524K vs 262K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Trinity Large Thinking if…

  • ModelCap publishes no field on which Trinity Large Thinking leads Solar Pro 4 for this pair.

Choose Solar Pro 4 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #109 against #111 (43.6 vs 43.5 points).
  • API cost matters — $0.36/1M output tokens against $0.80/1M, about 2.2× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.09/1M against $0.25/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 524K tokens against 262K.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1449 against 1414.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 29.2% against 15.8%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Solar Pro 4 was listed 10 August 2026, Trinity Large Thinking 1 April 2026.

Trinity Large Thinking vs Solar Pro 4: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Trinity Large Thinking and Solar Pro 4
FieldTrinity Large ThinkingArcee AISolar Pro 4Upstage
ModelCap Index position#111#109
Index score43.543.6
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.25$0.09
Output price / 1M tokens$0.80$0.36
Context window262K tokens524K tokens
Max output tokens80K131K
API providers listed11
Weight accessRestricted licenseAPI only
Input modalitiesTextText
First listed1 April 202610 August 2026
PublisherArcee AIUpstage

Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Trinity Large Thinking vs Solar Pro 4

Public benchmark boards where Trinity Large Thinking or Solar Pro 4 has a published result
BoardTrinity Large ThinkingSolar Pro 4Leads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14141407–142214491426–1472Solar Pro 4
LMArena AgentLMArena-15.5%-17.4%–-13.7%Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis10.8intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis90.1%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Trinity Large Thinking":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis15.8%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Trinity Large Thinking":reasoning=true29.2%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Solar Pro 4":reasoning=trueSolar Pro 4

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Trinity Large Thinking vs Solar Pro 4: common questions

Is Trinity Large Thinking better than Solar Pro 4?

Solar Pro 4 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 19 September 2026: #109 against #111. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Trinity Large Thinking cheaper than Solar Pro 4?

Solar Pro 4 is cheaper on output tokens: $0.36/1M against $0.80/1M. Input tokens are $0.25/1M for Trinity Large Thinking and $0.09/1M for Solar Pro 4. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.90 for Trinity Large Thinking versus $0.36 for Solar Pro 4. Solar Pro 4 costs 60.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Trinity Large Thinking or Solar Pro 4?

Solar Pro 4 has the larger context window: 524K tokens against 262K.

Which is better for coding, Trinity Large Thinking or Solar Pro 4?

Arena coding: Trinity Large Thinking 1414, Solar Pro 4 1449 — Solar Pro 4 leads.

Are Trinity Large Thinking and Solar Pro 4 open-weight models?

Trinity Large Thinking: Restricted license. Solar Pro 4: API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Trinity Large Thinking and Solar Pro 4?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Trinity Large Thinking and 1 for Solar Pro 4, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Trinity Large Thinking vs Solar Pro 4 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 19 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further