Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Trinity Large Thinking vs Nemotron 3 Super

Trinity Large Thinking (Arcee AI) and Nemotron 3 Super (NVIDIA) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 3 September 2026

As of 3 September 2026, Trinity Large Thinking holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#78 vs #79); Nemotron 3 Super is 2× cheaper per output token ($0.40/1M vs $0.80/1M); and Nemotron 3 Super offers the longer context window (1M vs 262K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Trinity Large Thinking if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #78 against #79 (36.4 vs 35.4 points).
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1414 against 1409.
  • AA τ²-Bench Telecom is your yardstick — 90.1% against 67.8%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Trinity Large Thinking was listed 1 April 2026, Nemotron 3 Super 11 March 2026.

Choose Nemotron 3 Super if…

  • API cost matters — $0.40/1M output tokens against $0.80/1M, about 2× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.085/1M against $0.25/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 262K.
  • you want provider choice — 2 listed API providers against 1.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 25.7 against 18.7.
  • AA Terminal-Bench 2.1 is your yardstick — 38.6% against 20.6%.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 20.8% against 15.8%.

Trinity Large Thinking vs Nemotron 3 Super: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Trinity Large Thinking and Nemotron 3 Super
FieldTrinity Large ThinkingArcee AINemotron 3 SuperNVIDIA
ModelCap Index position#78#79
Index score36.435.4
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.25$0.085
Output price / 1M tokens$0.80$0.40
Context window262K tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens80K16K
API providers listed12
Weight accessRestricted licenseRestricted license
Input modalitiesTextText
First listed1 April 202611 March 2026
PublisherArcee AINVIDIA

Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Trinity Large Thinking vs Nemotron 3 Super

Public benchmark boards where Trinity Large Thinking or Nemotron 3 Super has a published result
BoardTrinity Large ThinkingNemotron 3 SuperLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14141407–142214091395–1422Trinity Large Thinking
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis18.7intelligence-index25.7intelligence-indexNemotron 3 Super
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis20.6%terminal-bench-2.138.6%terminal-bench-2.1Nemotron 3 Super
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis90.1%tau2-bench-telecom67.8%tau2-bench-telecomTrinity Large Thinking
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis15.8%humanitys-last-exam20.8%humanitys-last-examNemotron 3 Super

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Trinity Large Thinking vs Nemotron 3 Super: common questions

Is Trinity Large Thinking better than Nemotron 3 Super?

Trinity Large Thinking ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 3 September 2026: #78 against #79. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it.

Is Trinity Large Thinking cheaper than Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper on output tokens: $0.40/1M against $0.80/1M. Input tokens are $0.25/1M for Trinity Large Thinking and $0.085/1M for Nemotron 3 Super. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens.

Which has the bigger context window, Trinity Large Thinking or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 262K.

Which is better for coding, Trinity Large Thinking or Nemotron 3 Super?

Arena coding: Trinity Large Thinking 1414, Nemotron 3 Super 1409 — Trinity Large Thinking leads. AA Terminal-Bench 2.1: Trinity Large Thinking 20.6%, Nemotron 3 Super 38.6% — Nemotron 3 Super leads.

Are Trinity Large Thinking and Nemotron 3 Super open-weight models?

Trinity Large Thinking: Restricted license. Nemotron 3 Super: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Trinity Large Thinking and Nemotron 3 Super?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Trinity Large Thinking and 2 for Nemotron 3 Super, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Trinity Large Thinking vs Nemotron 3 Super comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 3 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further