Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 13 September 2026

As of 13 September 2026, Claude Opus 5 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#3 vs #16); DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 41.7× cheaper per output token ($0.60/1M vs $25.00/1M); and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Claude Opus 5 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #3 against #16 (85.5 vs 76.5 points).
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 50.7 against 39.5.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 54.9% against 39.2%.

Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash if…

  • API cost matters — $0.60/1M output tokens against $25.00/1M, about 41.7× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.15/1M against $5.00/1M.
  • you want to self-host: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ships open weights while Claude Opus 5 is api only.
  • you want provider choice — 13 listed API providers against 5.
  • you want the more recently listed model — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash was listed 10 September 2026, Claude Opus 5 24 July 2026.

Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Claude Opus 5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
FieldClaude Opus 5AnthropicDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
ModelCap Index position#3#16
Index score85.576.5
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$5.00$0.15
Output price / 1M tokens$25.00$0.60
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens128K384K
API providers listed513
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, FileText, Image
First listed24 July 202610 September 2026
PublisherAnthropicDeepSeek

Evidence: 6 public benchmark observations across 6 boards · 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Public benchmark boards where Claude Opus 5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a published result
BoardClaude Opus 5DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15331526–1540HighOnly one result
LMArena AgentLMArena11.1%9.4%–12.8%HighOnly one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation90.4%MaxOnly one result
ARC-AGI-3ARC Prize Foundation30.2%HighOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis50.7intelligence-index:v4.3:max39.5intelligence-index:v4.3:maxClaude Opus 5
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis89.1%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis54.9%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)":reasoning=true39.2%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)":reasoning=trueClaude Opus 5
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)51.8%48.4%–55.2%Claude Code · MaxOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: common questions

Is Claude Opus 5 better than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

Claude Opus 5 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 13 September 2026: #3 against #16. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Claude Opus 5 cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $0.60/1M against $25.00/1M. Input tokens are $5.00/1M for Claude Opus 5 and $0.15/1M for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $22.50 for Claude Opus 5 versus $0.60 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs 97.3% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

Both publish a 1M-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Claude Opus 5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash open-weight models?

Claude Opus 5: API only. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Claude Opus 5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

ModelCap currently lists 5 API providers for Claude Opus 5 and 13 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 13 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further