Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Seed 2.1 Turbo

Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) and Seed 2.1 Turbo (ByteDance Seed) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 22 September 2026

As of 22 September 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#1 vs #23); Seed 2.1 Turbo is 8× cheaper per output token ($2.50/1M vs $20.00/1M); and Claude Opus 5.5 offers the longer context window (1M vs 262K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #1 against #23 (98.6 vs 79.7 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 262K.
  • you want provider choice — 5 listed API providers against 1.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Claude Opus 5.5 was listed 22 September 2026, Seed 2.1 Turbo 12 August 2026.

Choose Seed 2.1 Turbo if…

  • API cost matters — $2.50/1M output tokens against $20.00/1M, about 8× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.50/1M against $4.00/1M.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Seed 2.1 Turbo: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Claude Opus 5.5 and Seed 2.1 Turbo
FieldClaude Opus 5.5AnthropicSeed 2.1 TurboByteDance Seed
ModelCap Index position#1#23
Index score98.679.7
EvidenceMeasuredEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$4.00$0.50
Output price / 1M tokens$20.00$2.50
Context window1M tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens128K236K
API providers listed51
Weight accessAPI onlyAPI only
Input modalitiesText, Image, FileText, Image, Video
First listed22 September 202612 August 2026
PublisherAnthropicByteDance Seed

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · global-corpus-prior over 209 held-out anchors (11%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 3 rows (89%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 3 rows; no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 2.8 toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Claude Opus 5.5 vs Seed 2.1 Turbo

Public benchmark boards where Claude Opus 5.5 or Seed 2.1 Turbo has a published result
BoardClaude Opus 5.5Seed 2.1 TurboLeads
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation93.3%HighOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis57.6intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis61.4%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)":reasoning=trueOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Seed 2.1 Turbo: common questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than Seed 2.1 Turbo?

Claude Opus 5.5 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 22 September 2026: #1 against #23. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Claude Opus 5.5 cheaper than Seed 2.1 Turbo?

Seed 2.1 Turbo is cheaper on output tokens: $2.50/1M against $20.00/1M. Input tokens are $4.00/1M for Claude Opus 5.5 and $0.50/1M for Seed 2.1 Turbo. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $18.00 for Claude Opus 5.5 versus $2.25 for Seed 2.1 Turbo. Seed 2.1 Turbo costs 87.5% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or Seed 2.1 Turbo?

Claude Opus 5.5 has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 262K.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 5.5 or Seed 2.1 Turbo?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Claude Opus 5.5 and Seed 2.1 Turbo open-weight models?

Claude Opus 5.5: API only. Seed 2.1 Turbo: API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Claude Opus 5.5 and Seed 2.1 Turbo?

ModelCap currently lists 5 API providers for Claude Opus 5.5 and 1 for Seed 2.1 Turbo, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Claude Opus 5.5 vs Seed 2.1 Turbo comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 22 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further